Working Papers

  1. Curtice, John (2000). The Future of Election Studies: Mid-Life Crisis of New Youth? CREST Working Paper No. 78. London/Oxford: CREST: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends.
    URL: http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p78.pdf.

  2. Curtice, John and Blais, André (2001). Follow my Leader? A Cross-National Analysis of Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Democracies. CREST Working Paper No. 91. London/Oxford: CREST: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends.
    URL: http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p91.pdf.

  3. Curtice, John and Shively, W. Phillips (2000). Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many? CREST Working Paper 79. London/Oxford: CREST: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends.
    URL: http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p79.pdf.

  4. Farrell, David and McAllister, Ian (2004). Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting in Candidate-Centred Systems Make a Difference. Paper 04-04. University of California, Irvine, CA: Center for the Study of Democracy.
    URL: http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/04-04/.

  5. Freire, André (2003). Second order elections and electoral cycles in democratic Portugal, 1975-2002. WP3-2003 Instituto de Ciências Sociais Working Papers. Lisboa, Portugal: Universidade de Lisboa.
    URL: http://www.ics.ul.pt/publicacoes/workingpapers/wp2003/WP3-2003.pdf.

  6. Gschwend, Thomas (2004). Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: A Hierarchy of Electoral Systems. SFB 504 Discussion Paper 04-41. Mannheim: Universitat Mannheim.
    URL: http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dp04-41.pdf.

  7. Karp, Jeffrey A. and Banducci, Susan A. (2001). Political Efficacy and Participation in the 18 Democracies: How Electoral Rules Shape Political Behavior. Unpublished working paper.

  8. Kedar, Orit (Unpublished). When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections. Research paper. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
    URL: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~oritk/par-vote-04.pdf.

  9. Kedar, Orit (Unpublished). Who Prefers Extreme Parties: Voter Sophistication and Policy Balancing. Research paper. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
    URL: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~oritk/Kedar-APSA03.pdf.

  10. Liu, Alex (2001). Political Participation and Dissatisfaction with Democracy: A Comparative Study of New and Stable Democracies. Working Paper. The Research Methods Institute (URL: http://www.ResearchMethods.org).
    URL: http://www.researchmethods.org/polParti-new-dem.pdf.

  11. Magalhães, Pedro C. (Unpublished). Disaffected Democrats, Negligent Citizens: Political Culture and Political Action in Portugal. Research paper. Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa.

  12. Magalhães, Pedro C. (Unpublished). Exposure to Polls, Cognitive Mobilization, and Voting Behavior: the 2002 General Elections in Portugal. Research paper. Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa.
    URL: http://www.ics.ul.pt/corpocientifico/pedromagalhaes/pdf/Exposuretopolls.pdf.

  13. Mainwaring, Scott and Torcal, Mariano (2005). Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. Working Papers Online Series, Estudio/Working Paper 51/2005. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain: Departamento de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales.

  14. Mainwaring, Scott and Torcal, Mariano (2005). Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. Kellog Institute Working Papers Series WPS#319. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
    URL: http://www.nd.edu/~kellogg/WPS/319.pdf.

  15. Markowski, Radoslaw (2002). Diffuse Political Support in New and Stable Democracies: Do Institutions Matter? IWM Conferences, Lectures and Seminars. Vienna, Austria: Institute for Human Sciences (Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen).

  16. Marsh, Michael (Unpublished). An insecure anchor for a floating party system: party identification in Ireland. Manuscript, originally presented at the 2003 ECPR Joint Sessions in Edinburgh. Trinity College, Dublin.
    URL: http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/Staff/Michael.Marsh/ElectionStudy/partyid.pdf.

  17. Norris, Pippa (2005). The 'New Cleavage' Thesis and the Social Basis of Radical Right Support. KSG Working Paper No. RWP05-015.

  18. Scholz, Evi and Klein, Sabine (2003). Study Monitoring in the ISSP. ZUMA Working Paper No. 52. ZUMA, Mannheim, Germany.
    URL: http://www.gesis.org/Publikationen/Zeitschriften/ZUMA_Nachrichten/documents/pdfs/52/zn52_11.pdf.

  19. Simpser, Alberto (2004). Making Votes Not Count: Strategic Incentives for Electoral Corruption. Working Paper. Stanford University.
    URL: http://www.stanford.edu/class/polisci353/2004fall/reading/Simpser%20-%20Making%20votes%20not%20count.pdf.

  20. Solt, Frederick (2004). Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 385. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University.
    URL: http://www.lisproject.org/publications/liswps/385.pdf.

  21. Tóka, Gábor (2002). Voter Inequality, Turnout and Information Effects in a Cross-National Perspective. Helen Kellogg Institute Working Paper Series No. 297. Notre Dame, IN: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame.
    URL: http://www.nd.edu/~kellogg/WPS/297.pdf.

  22. Torcal, Mariano (2003). Political Disaffection and Democratization History in New Democracies. Working Paper #308. Notre Dame, Ind.: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
    URL: http://kellogg.nd.edu/WPS/308.pdf.