CSES Bibliography

Journal Articles

  1. Achen, Christopher H. 2005. Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis. Political Analysis 13: 447-56.

  2. Anderson, Cameron D. 2006. Economic Voting and Multi-level Governance: A Comparative Individual-Level Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2: 449-63.

  3. Arena, Juan Carlos, and Juan Carlos Escobar. 2000. Las elecciones de octubre en Medellín: candidaturas, temas y resultados. Estudios Políticos 17: 91-118.

  4. Banducci, Susan A., and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2000. Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems. Political Research Quarterly 53, no. 4: 815-48.
    http://www.jkarp.com/pdf/prq_2000.pdf

  5. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2008. Political Power and International Environmental Agreements: Business Influence over Participation and Compliance. Global Environmental Politics 8, no. 1.

  6. Bernhagen, Patrick, and Michael Marsh. 2007. The Partisan Effects of Low Turnout: Analyzing Vote Abstention as a Missing Data Problem. Electoral Studies.

  7. Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. 2007. Divergence in Diversity? The Dissimilar Effects of Cleavages on Electoral Politics in New Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 3: 602-19.

  8. Blais, André. 2006. Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policy makers? Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 10: 1243-62.

  9. Blais, André, and Marc André Bodet. 2006. Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers? Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 10: 1243-62.

  10. Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau, and Neil Nevitte. 2001. Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada and the United States. Political Behavior 23, no. 1: 5-22.

  11. Brady, Henry E. 2000. Contributions of Survey Research to Political Science. PS, Political Science & Politics 33, no. 1: 47-57.

  12. Brockington, David. 2004. The Paradox of Proportional Representation: The Effect of Party Systems and Coalitions on Individuals' Electoral Participation. Political Studies 52, no. 3: 469-90.

  13. Buendía, Jorge, and María Fernanda Somuano. 2003. Participación electoral en nuevas democracias: la elección presidencial de 2000 en México [Electoral Participación in new democracies: The presidentical elections of 2000 in Mexico]. Política y Gobierno X, no. 2: 289-323.
    http://www.politicaygobierno.cide.edu/num_anteriores/Vol_X_N2_2003/Buendia.pdf

  14. Cooper, Alexandra L. 2001. Nominating Presidential Candidates: The Primary Season Compared to Two Alternatives. Political Research Quarterly 54, no. 4: 771-94.

  15. Cosmin, Marian Gabriel. 2004. Informare politica si sisteme electorale in Europa Centrala si de Est. Revista Transilvanã De ªtiinþe Administrative 1, no. 10: 84-90.

  16. Dalton, Russell J. 2006. Social Modernization and the End of Ideology Debate: Patterns of Ideological Polarization. Japanese Journal of Political Science 7, no. 1: 1-22.

  17. Dalton, Russell J., and Aiji Tanaka. 2007. The Patterns of Polarization in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies.

  18. Dalton, Russell J., and S. Weldon. 2007. Partisanship and party system institutionalization . Party Politics 13, no. 2: 179-96.

  19. Dalton, Russell J., and Steven A. Weldon. 2004. L'immagine dei partiti politici nell'opinione pubblica: un male necessario? [Public Images of Political Parties: A Necessary Evil?]. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica 34, no. 3: 379-404.

  20. ———. 2005. Public images of political parties: A necessary evil? West European Politics 28, no. 5: 931-51.

  21. Dowley, Kathleen M., and Brian D. Silver. 2005. Crossnational Survey Research and Subnational Pluralism: A Research Note. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17, no. 2: 226-38.
    http://www.msu.edu/~bsilver/Dowley-Silver-XNational.pdf

  22. Enyedi, Zsolt, and Gábor Tóka. 2001. Moæ slabih: Politièke stranke u Maðarskoj [The Power of the Weak: Political Parties in Hungary]. Politièka Misao 38, no. 2: 68-90.

  23. Farrell, David, and Ian McAllister. 2006. Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does preferential voting in candidate-centred systems make a difference? European Journal of Political Research 45, no. 5: 723-49.

  24. Freire, André. 2004. Second-order elections and electoral cycles in democratic Portugal. South European Society & Politics 9, no. 3: 54-79.

  25. Gidengil, Elisabeth, André Blais, Neil Nevitte, and Richard Nadeau. 2001. The Correlates and Consequences of Anti-Partyism in the 1997 Canadian Election. Party Politics 7, no. 4: 491-513.
    http://www.ces-eec.umontreal.ca/documents%5CAnti-Partyism.pdf

  26. Grönlund, Kimmo. 2006. The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective . Scandinavian Political Studies 29, no. 4: 386-406.

  27. Gschwend, Thomas, and Dirk Leuffen. 2005. Divided We Stand - Unified We Govern? Cohabitation and Regime Voting in the 2002 French Elections. British Journal of Political Science 35, no. 4: 691-712.

  28. Heath, Anthony, Stephen Fisher, and Shawna Smith. 2005. The Globalization of Public Opinion Research. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 297-333.
    http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.090203.103000

  29. Hellwig, Timothy T. 2001. Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting . Journal of Politics 63, no. 4: 1141-62.

  30. Holmberg, Sören. 2003. Are political parties necessary? Electoral Studies 22, no. 2: 287-99.

  31. Huber, John, Georgia Kernell, and Eduardo L. Leoni. 2005. Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Party Attachments Across Democracies . Political Analysis 13, no. 4: 365-86.

  32. Chu, Yun-han, and Min-hua Huang. 2007. Partisanship and Citizen Politics in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies.

  33. Johnston, Ron. 2005. Learning about Ourselves from Learning about Others: Comparative Studies of Elections. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7, no. 2: 281-91.

  34. Karp, Jeffrey A., and Susan A. Banducci. 2007. Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies . Party Politics 13, no. 2: 217-34.

  35. Karp, Jeffrey A., and David Brockington. 2005. Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Over-Reporting Turnout in Five Countries. Journal of Politics 67, no. 3: 825-40.
    http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00341.x

  36. Kedar, Orit. 2005. How Diffusion of Power in Parliaments Affects Voter Choice. Political Analysis 13, no. 4: 410-429.

  37. ———. 2005. How Voters Work around Institutions: Policy Balancing in Staggered Elections. Electoral Studies.
    http://www-personal.umich.edu/~oritk/staggered.pdf

  38. ———. 2005. When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections. American Political Science Review 99: 185-99.

  39. Long, Karen J., and W. Phillips Shively. 2005. Applying a Two-Step Strategy to the Analysis of Cross-National Public Opinion Data. Political Analysis 13, no. 4: 327-44.

  40. Magalhães, Pedro C. 2005. Disaffected Democrats: Political Attitudes and Political Action in Portugal. West European Politics 28, no. 5: 973-91.

  41. Mainwaring, Scott, and Mariano Torcal. 2005. Teoria e institucionalização dos sistemas partidários após a terceira onda de democratização. Opinião Públic 11, no. 2: 249-86.

  42. Mainwaring, Scott, and Edurne Zoco. 2007. Political Consequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition. Party Politics 13, no. 2.

  43. Marsh, Michael. 2002. Electoral Context. Electoral Studies 21, no. 2: 207-17.

  44. ———. Forthcoming. Party identification in Ireland: An insecure anchor for a floating party system. Electoral Studies (2005).

  45. McAllister, Ian. 2005. Accountability, Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17, no. 3: 371-79.
    http://polsc.anu.edu.au/staff/mcallister/pubs/Account.pdf

  46. ———. 2007. Social Structure and Party Support in the East Asian Democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies.

  47. McAllister, Ian, and Stephen White. 2007. Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Postcommunist Societies. Party Politics 13, no. 2: 197-216.
    http://polsc.anu.edu.au/staff/mcallister/pubs/DemConsolid.pdf

  48. Milner, Henry. 2001. Civic Literacy in Comparative Context: Why Canadians Should be Concerned. Policy Matters 2, no. 2: 1-40.
    http://www.irpp.org/pm/archive/pmvol2no2.pdf

  49. Nalen, James E. 2001. Comparative Elections: Building a Basic Reference Collection. Reference & User Services Quarterly 41, no. 2: 119-26.

  50. Norris, Pippa. 2001. The Twilight of Westminster? Electoral Reform and Its Consequences. Political Studies 49, no. 5: 877-900.
    http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Acrobat/Political%20Studies%20Twilight.pdf

  51. Norris, Pippa, and Pedro Maia Soares. 2005. A tese da "nova clivagem" e a base social do apoio a direita radical. Opinião Pública 11, no. 1: 1-32.

  52. Pattie, Charles J., and Ron J. Johnston. 2004. Party knowledge and candidate knowledge: constituency campaigning and voting and the 1997 British General Election. Electoral Studies 23, no. 4: 795-819.

  53. Samuels, David. 2006. Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 48, no. 2: 1-27.

  54. Sheng, Emile. 2007. Partisanship in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies.

  55. Shinm, Doh Chull, and Byong-Kuen Jhee. 2005. How Does Democratic Regime Change Affect Mass Political Ideology? A Case Study of South Korea in Comparative Perspective. International Political Science Review 26, no. 4: 381-96.

  56. Sing, Ming. 2004. Origins of Anti-Partyism in Hong Kong. East Asia: An International Quarterly 21, no. 3: 37-57.

  57. Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., and Irina Tomescu-Dubrow. 2006. Representation of Post-Communist European Countries in Cross-National Public Opinion Surveys. Problems of Post-Communism 53, no. 4: 42-52.

  58. Thames, Frank C. 2007. Discipline and Party Institutionalization in Post-Soviet Legislatures. Party Politics 13, no. 4: 456-77.

  59. Tóka, Gábor. 2003. Can Voters Be Equal? A Cross-national Analysis: Part 1. Review of Sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association 9, no. 2: 51-72.

  60. ———. 2004. Can Voters Be Equal? A Cross-national Analysis: Part 2. Review of Sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association 10, no. 1: 47-65.

  61. Wattenberg, Martin P. 2003. Elections: Was the 2000 Presidential Election Fair? An Analysis of Comparative and Retrospective Survey Data. Presidential Studies Quarterly 33, no. 4: 889-97.

  62. Zielinsk, Jakub, Kazimierz M. Slomczynski, and Goldie Shabad. 2005. Electoral Control In New Democracies: The Perverse Incentives of Fluid Party Systems . World Politics 57, no. 3: 365-95.
    cses000422.pdf