CSES Bibliography

1. Aarts, Kees. 2006. Determining the Pattern of Party Evaluations: Proximity and Directional Models of Ideology. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee Meeting.Seville, Spain.
   http://www.cses.org/plancom/2006Seville/Aarts2006.pdf

2. Aarts, Kees, and Jacques J. A. Thomassen. 2005. Electoral Institutions and Satisfaction With Democracy. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
   http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/75.pdf

3. ———. 2006. Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter? Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

4. Aberg Martin, and Mikael Sandberg. 2003. Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-Communist Poland and Ukraine., 332 pp.Ashgate Publishing.

5. Achen, Christopher H. 2005. Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis. Political Analysis 13: 447-56.

6. Albright, Jeremy. 2006. Party Discipline, Voter Heterogeneity, and the Notion of Representation: The Strange Case of Spain. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

7. Albritton, Robert, and Thawilwadee Bureekul. 2006. Democracy: A Comparison of the 2001 and 2005 Parliamentary Elections in Thailand. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Fukuoka, Japan.

8. Anderson, Cameron. 2004. Economic Voting and Multi-level Governance: An Individual-level Analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association.Winnipeg, Canada.
   http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2004/Anderson,%20Cameron.pdf

9. Anderson, Cameron D. 2006. Economic Voting and Multi-level Governance: A Comparative Individual-Level Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2: 449-63.

10. Anderson, Christopher J., and Pablo Beramendi. 2005. Income inequality and turnout inequality in advanced industrial democracies. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

11. Anderson, Christopher J., André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug. 2005. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12. Arena, Juan Carlos, and Juan Carlos Escobar. 2000. Las elecciones de octubre en Medellín: candidaturas, temas y resultados. Estudios Políticos 17: 91-118.

13. Arian, Asher, and Michal Shamir. 2001. Context and Comparison in Election Research: The Israel. Election Studies: What's Their Use? Ed. Elihu Katz, and Yael Warshel, 127-48. Westview Press.

14. Arnold, Jason Ross. 2007. Individual and Contextual Effects on Political Knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

15. Badescu, Gabriel. Forthcoming. Cultural Heritage and Romanian Political Democratic Communities. Pathways to Democratic Community. eds. Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Dieter Fuchs, Ronald Inglehart, and Jan ZielonkaOxford University Press.
    http://www.ceu.hu/cps/bluebird/pap/badescu2.pdf

16. Badescu, Gabriel, and Paul Sum. Forthcoming. Ideological Voting: Left-Right Orientation in a Cross-National Context. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

17. ———. 2005. The Importance of Left-Right Orientations in the New Democracies. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
    http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/76.pdf

18. ———. 2005. Mapping Political Preferences: The Emergence of Citizen Left-Right Orientations in New Democracies. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionWashington DC, United States.
    http://www.umich.edu/~cses/plancom/module3/2005plenary/Badescu2005.pdf

19. ———. 2000. Political Choice in an Unstructured Party System: The Importance of the Left-Right Schema in Post-Communist Europe. Paper presented at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

20. Bajarunieni, Rita et al. Forthcoming. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Final Report of the 1995-96 Planning Committee. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

21. Banducci, Susan A., and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2004. The 2002 Election in Comparative Context. Voters' Veto: The 2002 Election in New Zealand and the Consolidation of Minority Government. Ed. Jack Vowles, 150-66 pp. Aukland University Press.

22. ———. 2000. Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems. Political Research Quarterly 53, no. 4: 815-48.
    http://www.jkarp.com/pdf/prq_2000.pdf

23. ———. 2004. New Zealand in Comparative Perspective. In Voters' Veto: The 2002 Election in New Zealand and the Consolidation of Minority Government. Eds. Jack Vowles, Peter Aimer, Susan A. Banducci, Jeffrey A. Karp, and Raymond Miller, 150-166. Auckland NZ: Auckland University Press.

24. Beard, Virginia Parish. 2006. Democratic Behaviors in Emerging African Democracies: The Role of Gender and Religion. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

25. Beltrán, Ulises. 2006. Contextual effects on the individual rationality: economic conditions and vote. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

26. ———. 2005. Do Economic Differences or Institutions Explain Variance in the Economic Vote Among Countries? Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
    http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/69.pdf

27. ———. 2007. Efectos contextuales sobre la racionalidad individual: Condiciones Económicas y voto retrospectivo. Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Opinión Pública.

28. Bengtsson, Åsa. 2005. Inclusiveness or accountability: What brings about the most responsive system? Paper presented at the Workshop no. 15 "Democracy, accountability and political behaviour", Nordic Political Science Association (NOPSA).Reykjavik, Iceland.
    http://registration.yourhost.is/nopsa2005/papers/NOPSA2005_workshop%2015_Bengtsson.pdf

29. ———. 2005. Prerequisites for accountability and political efficacy. Paper presented at the International conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
    http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/78.pdf

30. ———. 2005. Prerequisites for accountability and political efficacy. Paper presented at the Karlstad seminar on studying political action.Karlstad University.
    http://www.sam.kau.se/stv/ksspa/papers/bengtsson.pdf

31. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2005. Business Political Power: Economic Voting, Information Asymmetry, and Environmental Policy in 19 OECD Countries. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

32. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2005. Information, Organization and Structural Power: Estimating Business Influence over Environmental Policy in 22 OECD Countries. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

33. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2000. Political Power and International Environmental Agreements: Business Influence over Participation and Compliance. Paper prepared for delivery at the 47th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association.San Diego, CA.

34. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2008. Political Power and International Environmental Agreements: Business Influence over Participation and Compliance. Global Environmental Politics 8, no. 1.

35. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2005. The Political Power of Business: Environmental Regime Stringency and Information Asymmetry in Thirty-one Capitalist Democracies. Paper prepared for delivery at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

36. Bernhagen, Patrick. 2005. "The Political Power of Business: Structure and Information in Public Policymaking." Ph.D. Dissertation, Trinity College.

37. Bernhagen, Patrick, and Michael Marsh. Forthcoming. Citizen participation: Voting and beyond. Democracy in the New Europe. Ed. Hans-Dieter Klingemann.

38. Bernhagen, Patrick, and Michael Marsh. 2007. The Partisan Effects of Low Turnout: Analyzing Vote Abstention as a Missing Data Problem. Electoral Studies.

39. Bernhagen, Patrick, and Michael Marsh. 2004. Turnout matters: sometimes. Presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshop (Workshop 9 "Low Turnout: Does it Matter?").Uppsala, Sweden.
    http://www.essex.ac.uk/ECPR/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/uppsala/ws9/Bernhagen.pdf

40. ———. 2005. Turnout matters: sometimes . Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
    http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/71.pdf

41. Berumen, Edmundo, and David Crow. 2005. Turnout Overreporting in Mexico and What to Do about It. Paper presented at the Conference on Surveys and Methods in Mexican Politics.

42. Birch, Sarah. 2007. Compulsory Electoral Participation and Political Legitimacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association .

43. ———. 2005. Explaining Confidence in the Conduct of Elections. Paper prepared for delivery at the Elections, Public Opinion and Political Parties Conference.University of Essex.
    http://www.essex.ac.uk/bes/EPOP%202005/Papers/Explaining%20Confidence%20in%20the%20Conduct%20of%20Elections.doc

44. ———. 2005. Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

45. Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. 2007. Divergence in Diversity? The Dissimilar Effects of Cleavages on Electoral Politics in New Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 3: 602-19.

46. Blais, André. 2006. Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policy makers? Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 10: 1243-62.

47. ———. 2003. How Do Losers Assess Electoral Democracy? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
    http://mpsa.indiana.edu/conf2003papers/1031558860.pdf

48. Blais, André, and Marc André Bodet. 2005. Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policymakers? Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
    http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/67.pdf

49. ———. 2006. Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers? Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 10: 1243-62.

50. Blais, André, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau, and Neil Nevitte. 1999. Measuring Party Identification: Canada, Britain, and the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Atlanta, GA.

51. ———. 2001. Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada and the United States. Political Behavior 23, no. 1: 5-22.

52. Blais, André, and Peter John Loewen. 2006. Electoral Systems and Evaluations of Democracy. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

53. Borg, Sami, and Heikki Paloheimo. 2003. Research and Data on Finnish Elections: An Overview. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
    ftp://nes.isr.umich.edu/ftp/cses/meetings/2003Plenary/2003Plenary_panels_BorgPaloheimo.pdf

54. Bovens, Mark, and Anchrit Wille. 2007. Diploma democracy: The disappearance of the less educated from political life. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

55. Bowler, Shaun, and T. Donovan. 2000. Public Attitudes About Changing Political Institutions. Paper prepared for the Political Economy Conference.Washington University.

56. Brader, Ted, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2005. Individual and Institutional Origins of Partisanship. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionWashington DC, United States.

57. Brady, Henry E. 2000. Contributions of Survey Research to Political Science. PS, Political Science & Politics 33, no. 1: 47-57.

58. Brockington, David. 2003. Constricted Policy Space and Political Participation: Evidence from 34 Democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

59. ———. 2003. Familiarity Breeds Contentment: Contextual and Individual Determinants of Democratic Satisfaction in 34 Democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
    http://mpsa.indiana.edu/conf2003papers/1032082350.pdf

60. ———. 2004. The Paradox of Proportional Representation: The Effect of Party Systems and Coalitions on Individuals' Electoral Participation. Political Studies 52, no. 3: 469-90.

61. Brockington, David, and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2002. Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Over-Reporting Turnout in Five Countries. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Boston, MA.

62. Broscheid, Andreas, and Thomas Gschwend. 2003. Augäpfel, Murmeltiere und Bayes: Zur Auswertung stochastischer Daten aus Vollerhebungen. MPIfG Working Paper 03/7.
    http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/workpap/wp03-7/wp03-7.pdf

63. Buendía, Jorge, and María Fernanda Somuano. 2003. Participación electoral en nuevas democracias: la elección presidencial de 2000 en México [Electoral Participación in new democracies: The presidentical elections of 2000 in Mexico]. Política y Gobierno X, no. 2: 289-323.
    http://www.politicaygobierno.cide.edu/num_anteriores/Vol_X_N2_2003/Buendia.pdf

64. Byong-Kuen Jhee. 2004. Economic Voting in the Third World. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

65. Carlin, Ryan, and Gregory Love. 2007. Policy Salience, Strategic Mobilization, and Voter Turnout. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

66. Castillo, Antonio M. Jaime. 2006. Institutional Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy. A Comparative Analysis. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.
    http://www.cses.org/plancom/2006Seville/Castillo2006.pdf

67. Claibourn, Michele, and Virginia Sapiro. 2000. Gender Differences in Citizen-Level Democratic Citizenship: Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Paper prepared for the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.
    http://faculty.virginia.edu/mclaibourn/comp_gen_mw.pdf

68. ———. 2001. Gender Differences in Citizen-Level Democratic Citizenship: Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
    http://faculty.virginia.edu/mclaibourn/comp_gen_mw.pdf

69. ———. 2002. Gender Differences in Citizen-Level Democratic Citizenship: Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Presented at the Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems".WZB, Berlin, Germany.

70. ———. 2000. Institutional, Cultural and Social Variations and the Explanation of Gender Differences in Citizen Orientations. Paper prepared for the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

71. Clarke, Harold, David Sanders, Marianne Stewart, Paul Whiteley, Gabriel Badescu, and Paul Sum. 2005. Political Choice in Britain: The 2005 BES. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionWashington DC, United States.

72. Colton, Timothy J. 2000. Babes in Partyland: The Riddle of Partisanship in Post-Soviet Russia. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2000 World Democratization Conference on Re-Thinking Democracy in the New Millennium.University of Houston, Houston, TX.
    http://www.uh.edu/democracy/coltonp.pdf

73. Colton, Timothy J. 2004. Parties, Citizens, and the Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in Russia. After the Collapse of Communism: Comparative Lessons of Transition. Michael MacFaul, and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss, 173-206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

74. Cooper, Alexandra L. 2001. Nominating Presidential Candidates: The Primary Season Compared to Two Alternatives. Political Research Quarterly 54, no. 4: 771-94.

75. Cosmin, Marian Gabriel. 2004. Informare politica si sisteme electorale in Europa Centrala si de Est. Revista Transilvanã De ªtiinþe Administrative 1, no. 10: 84-90.

76. Curtice, John. 2003. Elections as Beauty Contests: Do the Rules Matter? Paper presented at the International Conference on 'Portugal at the Polls'.Lisbon, Portugal.
    http://www.ics.ul.pt/ceapp/conferencias/portugalavotos/jcurtice/leaderschapter.pdf

77. ———. 2000. The Future of Election Studies: Mid-Life Crisis of New Youth? CREST Working Paper No. 78London/Oxford: CREST: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends.
    http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p78.pdf

78. ———. 2002. The state of election studies: mid-life crisis or new youth? 161-68.

79. ———. Forthcoming. Who Represents Us Best: One Member or Many? In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

80. Curtice, John, and André Blais. 2001. Follow My Leader? A Cross-National Analysis of Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.San Francisco, CA.

81. ———. 2001. Follow my Leader? A Cross-National Analysis of Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Democracies. CREST Working Paper No. 91London/Oxford: CREST: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends.
    http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p91.pdf

82. Curtice, John, and W. Phillips Shively. 2000. Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many? Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

83. ———. 2000. Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many? CREST Working Paper 79London/Oxford: CREST: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends.
    http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk/papers/p79.pdf

84. ———. 2002. Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many? Paper presented at the International Fulbright Conference "Eleições e Democracia".Lisboa, Portugal.
    http://www.ics.ul.pt/ceapp/conferencias/fulbright/6JCWPS.pdf

85. Dahlberg, Stephan, Henrik Oscarsson, Gabriel Badescu, and Daniel Berlin. 2005. Ideological voting under different institutional contexts: Political communication and effective representation in 37 countries. Paper presented at the XIV NOPSA Conference.Reykjavik, Iceland.
    http://registration.yourhost.is/nopsa2005/papers/Issue%20voting%20under%20different%20institutional%20contexts%20-%20NOPSA%202005.pdf

86. Dalton, Russell. 2007. The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization and Its Consequences. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

87. Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

88. ———. 2005. The Myth of the Disengaged American.

89. ———. 2006. Social Modernization and the End of Ideology Debate: Patterns of Ideological Polarization. Japanese Journal of Political Science 7, no. 1: 1-22.

90. Dalton, Russell J., and Aiji Tanaka. 2007. The Patterns of Polarization in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies.

91. Dalton, Russell J., and S. Weldon. 2007. Partisanship and party system institutionalization . Party Politics 13, no. 2: 179-96.

92. Dalton, Russell J., and Steven A. Weldon. 2004. L'immagine dei partiti politici nell'opinione pubblica: un male necessario? [Public Images of Political Parties: A Necessary Evil?]. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica 34, no. 3: 379-404.

93. ———. 2005. Is the Party Over? Spreading Antipathy Toward Political Parties.

94. ———. 2005. Public images of political parties: A necessary evil? West European Politics 28, no. 5: 931-51.

95. Díez-Nicolás, Juan. 2000. An Attempt to Interpret Party Attachment in Old and New Democracies. Paper presented at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

96. Díez-Nicolás, Juan, Kenneth A. Rasinski, and Tom W. Smith. 2005. A Comparison of Public Responses to Terrorist Attacks in Spain and the United States. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
    http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/88.pdf

97. Dinas, Elias, and Sergi Pardos Prado. 2007. Exploring contextual heterogeneity in issue voting: Proximity versus direction. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

98. Dowley, Kathleen, and Brian Silver. 2003. Cross-National Survey Research and Subnational Pluralism: A Research Note. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

99. Dowley, Kathleen M., and Brian D. Silver. 2005. Crossnational Survey Research and Subnational Pluralism: A Research Note. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17, no. 2: 226-38.
    http://www.msu.edu/~bsilver/Dowley-Silver-XNational.pdf

100. ———. 2007. Political Institutions and Minority Group Perceptions of Democracy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

101. Drummond, Andrew. 2007. Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Small and Large Party Systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

102. Drummond, Andrew J. 2006. The Impact of Party Affect on Voter Sincerity in Open and Closed Electoral Systems, University of California eScholarship Repository .
     cses000414.pdf

103. ———. 2006. Open and Closed: Party Affect and Sincere Voting in Electoral Context. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

104. ———. 2005. Thinking Outside the (Ballot) Box: Gauging the Cognitive Consequences of Electoral Rules for Partisans and Partisanship. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

105. Duch, Raymond M., and Randy Stevenson. 2003. The Micro-Foundations of the Economic Vote in Comparative Perspective. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops (Workshop 26 "Modeling Electoral Choice in Europe in the Twenty-First Century").Edinburgh, Scotland.

106. ———. 2003. The Micro-Foundations of the Economic Vote in Comparative Perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
     http://mpsa.indiana.edu/conf2003papers/1037551222.pdf

107. Enyedi, Zsolt, and Bojan Todosijeviæ. 2006. Adversarial politics and party identification in Eastern and Western Europe. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops.Nicosia, Cyprus.

108. Enyedi Zsolt, and Gábor Tóka. 2005. Ascendant, Yet Fragile. In Political Parties in Transitional Democracies. Editors Stephen White, David Stansfield, and Paul WebbOxford: Oxford University Press.

109. Enyedi, Zsolt, and Gábor Tóka. 2001. Moæ slabih: Politièke stranke u Maðarskoj [The Power of the Weak: Political Parties in Hungary]. Politièka Misao 38, no. 2: 68-90.

110. Farrell, David, and Ian McAllister. 2006. Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does preferential voting in candidate-centred systems make a difference? European Journal of Political Research 45, no. 5: 723-49.

111. ———. 2003. Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting Make a Difference? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

112. ———. 2003. Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting Make a Difference? Paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference.University of Tasmania, Hobart.
     http://www.utas.edu.au/government/APSA/FarrellMcAllisterfinal.pdf

113. Farrell, David, and Ian McAllister. 2004. Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting in Candidate-Centred Systems Make a Difference. Paper 04-04University of California, Irvine, CA: Center for the Study of Democracy.
     http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/04-04/

114. Fisher, Stephen, Laurence Lessard-Phillips, Sara Binzer Hobolt, and John Curtice. 2006. How the effect of political knowledge on turnout differs in plurality electoral systems. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

115. Fisher, Stephen D., Laurence Lessard-Phillips, Sara Binzer Hobolt, and John Curtice. 2007. Accountability and representation: Voter approaches to elections. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

116. Fraile, Marta. 2005. Political Knowledge and the logic of voting: A comparative study. Presented at the 3rd ECPR General Conference.Budapest.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/generalconference/budapest/papers/5/1/fraile.pdf

117. Franklin, Mark N., and Christopher Wlezien, Eds. 2002. The Future of Election Studies. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

118. ———. 2002. Reinventing election studies. 331-38.

119. Freire, André. 2003. Issue Voting in Portugal: The 2002 legislative elections . Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
     ftp://nes.isr.umich.edu/ftp/cses/meetings/2003Plenary/2003Plenary_panels_Freire.pdf

120. ———. 2004. Second-order elections and electoral cycles in democratic Portugal. South European Society & Politics 9, no. 3: 54-79.

121. ———. 2003. Second order elections and electoral cycles in democratic Portugal, 1975-2002. WP3-2003 Instituto de Ciências Sociais Working PapersLisboa, Portugal: Universidade de Lisboa.
     http://www.ics.ul.pt/publicacoes/workingpapers/wp2003/WP3-2003.pdf

122. ———. 2005. The Social Bases of Left and Right in Western Europe. Paper presented at the conference Electoral Behaviour and Political Attitudes: Portugal in the European Context.
     http://www.ics.ul.pt/agenda/comportamentoeleitoral/pdf/AndreFreire.pdf

123. Freire, André, and Michael Baum. 2002. Second order elections and electoral cycles in democratic Portugal, 1975-2002. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Boston, MA.

124. Freire, André, Marina Costa Lobo, and Pedro Magalhães, Eds. 2004. Portugal a Votos. As Eleições Legislativas de 2002. Lisboa, Portugal: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

125. Freire, André, Marina Costa Lobo, Pedro Magalhães, and Ana Espírito Santo, Eds. 2003. As eleições legislativas de 2002: inquérito pós-eleitoral. Lisboa, Portugal: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

126. Gidengil, E. et. al. Under review. The Correlates and Consequences of Anti-Partyism in the 1997 Canadian Election. In Canadian Democracy at Century's End. Ed. W. CrossOxford University Press.

127. Gidengil, Elisabeth, André Blais, Neil Nevitte, and Richard Nadeau. 2001. The Correlates and Consequences of Anti-Partyism in the 1997 Canadian Election. Party Politics 7, no. 4: 491-513.
     http://www.ces-eec.umontreal.ca/documents%5CAnti-Partyism.pdf

128. Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski. 2007. Ideological Congruence and Two Visions of Democracy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

129. Gray, Mark Michael. 2003. "In the midst of fellows: The social context of the American turnout decision." Ph.D Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

130. Grönlund, Kimmo. 2006. The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective . Scandinavian Political Studies 29, no. 4: 386-406.

131. ———. 2002. How Education and Political Information Affect Turnout in Different Electoral Systems. Paper prepared for the 30th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops (Workshop 22 "Political Participation and Information").Universitá di Torino.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/turin/ws22/Gronlund.pdf

132. ———. 2003. Knowledge and Turnout: A Comparative Analysis. Paper prepared for the 2nd ECPR General Conference.Marburg, Germany.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/generalconference/marburg/papers/14/2/Gronlund.pdf

133. ———. 2005. Political Knowledge and the Internet . Paper presented at the XIV NOPSA Conference.Reykjavik, Iceland.
     http://registration.yourhost.is/nopsa2005/papers/Gronlund%20Political%20Knowledge%20and%20the%20Internet.pdf

134. Grosse, Ashley. 2002. "Big Social Science" in Comparative Politics: A Case Study of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Paper prepared for Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems".WZB, Berlin, Germany.

135. ———. Forthcoming. ‘Big Social Science’ in Comparative Politics: The History of Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

136. Gschwend, Thomas. 2003. Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: A Hierarchy of Electoral Systems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.
     http://www.sowi.uni-mannheim.de/lehrstuehle/lspol1/APSA03.pdf

137. ———. 2004. Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: A Hierarchy of Electoral Systems. SFB 504 Discussion Paper 04-41Mannheim: Universitat Mannheim.
     http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dp04-41.pdf

138. ———. Forthcoming. Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: A Hierarchy of Electoral Systems. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

139. ———. 2003. Comparative Politics of Strategic Voting: An Empirical Test of the Leys-Sartori Conjecture. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
     http://mpsa.indiana.edu/conf2003papers/1031925936.pdf

140. Gschwend, Thomas, and Dirk Leuffen. 2005. Divided We Stand - Unified We Govern? Cohabitation and Regime Voting in the 2002 French Elections. British Journal of Political Science 35, no. 4: 691-712.

141. Haerpfer, Christian W. 2006. Political Support for Democracy and Satisfaction with Democracy in European Political Systems. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

142. Hale, Henry. 2005. Why not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, and the State. 288 pp.Cambridge University Press.

143. Hansen, John Mark. 2001. "Task Force on the Federal Election System, Chapter 1: Sizing the Problem." Report of the National Commission on Election Reform (pp. 1-9), Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, /cses000171.pdf/.
     http://millercenter.virginia.edu/programs/natl_commissions/commission_final_report/task_force_report/hansen_chap1_size.pdf

144. Heath, Anthony, Stephen Fisher, and Shawna Smith. 2005. The Globalization of Public Opinion Research. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 297-333.
     http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.090203.103000

145. Hellwig, Timothy T. 2001. Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting . Journal of Politics 63, no. 4: 1141-62.

146. ———. 2006. Policy Voting in Postindustrial Democracies: Measuring and Explaining the Salience of Left-Right Ideology. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

147. Henderson, Ailsa. 2004. Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from Westminster systems. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

148. ———. 2004. Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from Westminster systems. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association.Winnipeg, Canada..
     http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2004/Henderson,%20Ailsa.pdf

149. Henjak, Anrija. 2003. New Social Divisions and Party System Developments. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops.Edinburgh.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ECPR/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/edinburgh/ws19/Henjak.pdf

150. Hobolt, S. B., S. D. Fisher, J. Curtice, and L. Lessard-Phillips. 2006. How the effect of political knowledge on turnout differs in plurality electoral systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

151. Hobolt, Sara, Laurence Lessard-Phillips, John Curtice, and Stephen Fisher. 2007. Accountability and Representation: Voter Approaches to Elections. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

152. Hobolt, Sara Binzer, and Robert Klemmensen. 2005. Welfare to Vote: The Effect of Government Spending on Turnout. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionWashington DC, United States.
     http://www.cses.org/plancom/module3/2005plenary/Hobolt2005.pdf

153. ———. 2006. Welfare to Vote: The Effect of Government Spending on Turnout. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

154. Holmberg, Sören. 2003. Are political parties necessary? Electoral Studies 22, no. 2: 287-99.

155. ———. 2000. Candidate Knowledge Differs Across Electoral Systems. Paper presented at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

156. ———. Forthcoming. Candidate Recognition in Different Electoral Systems. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

157. Holmberg, Sören, and Henrik Oscarsson. 2002. "Svenskt väljarbeteende." Statistics Sweden, Stockholm, /cses000215.pdf/.
     http://www.scb.se/statistik/me/me0106/2002m00/allm%E4nna%20valen%20kap%204.pdf

158. Holzner, Claudio A. 2006. Policies and Political Participation in Latin America. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

159. ———. 2005. Poverty of Democracy: Neoliberal Reforms and Political Participation of the Poor in Mexico. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

160. Howell, David, and Karen J. Long. Forthcoming. Methodological Challenges. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

161. Howell, David A., and Karen J. Long. 2002. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Questions for the Future: Methodological Research Opportunities. Paper prepared for the Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems".WZB, Berlin, Germany.

162. Huang, Chi. 2003. Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study, 2001 (TEDS 2001). Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
     ftp://nes.isr.umich.edu/ftp/cses/meetings/2003Plenary/2003Plenary_panels_Huang.pdf

163. Huber, John, Georgia Kernell, and Eduardo L. Leoni. 2003. Institutional context and party attachments in established democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
     http://www.columbia.edu/~jdh39/huber_kernell_leoni.pdf

164. ———. 2005. Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Party Attachments Across Democracies . Political Analysis 13, no. 4: 365-86.

165. ———. 2003. The Institutional Origins of Party Identification. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
     http://www.columbia.edu/~ell2002/huberetal.pdf

166. Chu, Yun-han, and Min-hua Huang. 2007. Partisanship and Citizen Politics in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies.

167. Chu, Yun-han, Ming-hua Huang, and Yu-tzung Chang. 2005. Identifying Sources of Democratic Legitimacy in Established and Emerging Democracies. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
     http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/83.pdf

168. Ikeda, Ken'ichi. 2006. Japanese National Elections 2001-2005 and its CSES2 Module. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

169. Isaev, Kusein. 2006. Peculiarities and Results of the 2005 Elections in Kyrgyzstan. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.
     http://www.cses.org/plancom/2006Seville/Isaev2006.pdf

170. Jackson, Robert J., and Doreen Jackson. 1997. Comparative Government: An Introduction to Political Science. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Prentice-Hall.

171. Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. 2001. Pocketbook or Rosary? Economic and Identity Voting in the 2000 Presidential Election in Poland. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies.Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge.

172. Johnston, Ron. 2005. Learning about Ourselves from Learning about Others: Comparative Studies of Elections. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7, no. 2: 281-91.

173. Jusko, Karen Long. 2005. The Political Representation of the Poor: A Research Note Using CSES Data. Prepared for presentation at the Plenary Meetings of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.

174. Kage, Rieko. 2000. Path-Dependency Effects in Electoral System Change. Paper presented at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

175. Karp, Jeffrey, and Susan Banducci. Forthcoming. Electoral Systems, Efficacy and Voter Participation. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

176. Karp, Jeffrey A. 2003. Electoral Systems and Party Mobilization . Paper presented at the 19th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Durban, South Africa.

177. ———. 2006. Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

178. Karp, Jeffrey A., and Susan A. Banducci. 1999. Electoral Rules and Voter Participation: A Cross-National Analysis of Individual-Level Behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Atlanta, GA.

179. ———. 2000. Electoral Rules and Voter Participation: A Cross-National Analysis of Individual-Level Behavior. XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

180. ———. 2006. Electoral Systems and Political Efficacy. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.
     http://www.cses.org/plancom/2006Seville/KarpBanducci2006.pdf

181. ———. 2007. Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies . Party Politics 13, no. 2: 217-34.

182. ———. 2001. Political Efficacy and Participation in the 18 Democracies: How Electoral Rules Shape Political Behavior. Unpublished working paper.

183. Karp, Jeffrey A., and David Brockington. 2005. Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Over-Reporting Turnout in Five Countries. Journal of Politics 67, no. 3: 825-40.
     http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00341.x

184. Karvonen, Lauri. 2000. Preferential Voting: Does it Make a Difference? Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

185. Kedar, Orit. 2005. How Diffusion of Power in Parliaments Affects Voter Choice. Political Analysis 13, no. 4: 410-429.

186. ———. 2005. How Diffusion of Power in Parliaments Affects Voter Choice. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionWashington DC, United States.

187. ———. 2005. How Voters Work around Institutions: Policy Balancing in Staggered Elections. Electoral Studies.
     http://www-personal.umich.edu/~oritk/staggered.pdf

188. ———. 2003. Policy Balancing in Comparative Context: Institutional Mediation of Voter Behavior. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops.Edinburgh.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ECPR/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/edinburgh/ws26/Kedar.pdf

189. ———. 2005. When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections. American Political Science Review 99: 185-99.

190. ———. Unpublished. Who Prefers Extreme Parties: Voter Sophistication and Policy Balancing. Research paperAnn Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
     http://www-personal.umich.edu/~oritk/Kedar-APSA03.pdf

191. Kernell, Georgia. 2006. Party Constitutions and Constituent Representation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

192. ———. 2007. Party Experience, Consistency and Partisanship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

193. Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2005. Rising Political Inequality in Established Democracies: Mobilization, Socio-Economic Status and Voter Turnout, 1960s to 2000. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

194. Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Mark Michael Gray. 2006. Voter Equality in Post-Industrialized Nations: Individual Resources and Political Context. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

195. Klein, Markus, and Manuela Pötschke. 2000. Wahlen im sozialen Kontext: Mehrebenenanalyse des Wählerverhaltens bei den Bundestagswahlen der Jahre 1969 bix 1998. In 50 Jahre Empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland. Eds. Markus Klein, Wolfgang Jagodzinski, Ekkehard Mochmann, and Dieter Ohr, 182-211. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

196. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 2003. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems: A Reminder of Module One. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
     ftp://nes.isr.umich.edu/ftp/cses/meetings/2003Plenary/2003Plenary_handout_Klingemann.pdf

197. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, and Bernhard Wessels. 2003. Political Consequences of Germany's Mixed-Member System: Personalization at the Grass-Roots? In Mixed Member Electoral Systems. The Best of Both Worlds? Eds. Matthew Soberg Shugart, and Martin P. Wattenberg, 279-96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

198. ———. 2002. Sincere Voting in Different Electoral Systems. Presented at the Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems".WZB, Berlin, Germany.
     http://www.wz-berlin.de/~wessels/Downloads/sincere1a.pdf

199. ———. 2000. Voter Rationalities in Different Electoral Systems. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.
     http://www.wz-berlin.de/~wessels/Downloads/wekli1c.pdf

200. Knight, K., and Michael Marsh. 2002. Varieties of election studies. 169-87.

201. Kroh, Martin. 2003. Contextual Variation in Voters' Reasoning: Voting in Systems of Single Party and Coalition Governments. Paper presented at the 19th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Durban, South Africa.

202. ———. 2003. "Parties, Politicians, and Policies: Orientations of Vote Choice Across Voters and Contexts." Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Science at the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

203. ———. 2004. Personal Voting: Individual and Contextual Determinants of Political Leadership . Paper presented at the Gemeinsame Tagung des Arbeitskreises Interkultureller Demokratievergleich und der Ad-hoc-Gruppe Empirische Methoden der Politikwissenschaft.Universität Lüneburg.
     http://www.uni-lueneburg.de/fb2/zdemo/dvpw/dateien/Kroh.pdf

204. Lacewell, Onawa. 2007. Measures of Immigration and Radical Right Voting in Europe. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

205. Lau, Richard R., Parina Patel, Dalia F. Fahmy, and Robert R. Kaufman. 2005. Correct Voting Across 30 Democracies (and 40 Elections). Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

206. Lee, HyunChool. 2006. Gender Differences in Political Participation in Korea and Japan. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Fukuoka, Japan.

207. Lee, Nam-Young, Hyung-Joon Kim, Young-Tae Kim, and Wook Kim. 2005. The Political Effects of the Introduction of “Two-Ballot Votes” System in Korea: Comparison with Japan, New Zealand, and Germany. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
     http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/77.pdf

208. Listhaug, Ola, Bernt Aardal, and Ingunn Opheim Ellis. Forthcoming. Institutional Variation and Political Support. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

209. ———. 2000. Institutional Variation and Political Support: An Analysis of CSES Data from 16 Countries. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

210. Liu, Alex. 2001. Political Participation and Dissatisfaction with Democracy: A Comparative Study of New and Stable Democracies. Working Paper, The Research Methods Institute (URL: http://www.ResearchMethods.org).
     http://www.researchmethods.org/polParti-new-dem.pdf

211. Lobo, Marina Costa. 2002. The Impact of Party Leaders on the Outcome of the 2002 Portuguese Legislative Elections: Choosing between Relatively Unpopular Candidates. Paper presented at the International Conference on 'Portugal at the Polls'.Lisboa, Portugal.
     http://www.ics.ul.pt/ceapp/conferencias/portugalavotos/mcostalobo/paperleadereffects2002mcl.pdf

212. Loewen, Peter John, and André Blais. 2006. Testing Publius' Federalism: Losers Consent, Winners Lament? Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.
     http://www.cses.org/plancom/2006Seville/LoewenBlais2006.pdf

213. Long, Karen J. 2002. Are all politics local? A multi-level analysis of voters' decisions. Paper prepared for presentation at the PhD Summer School on European Parties and Party Systems.Keele University, UK.

214. ———. 2005. The Political Representation of the Poor: A Research Note Using CSES Data. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionWashington DC, United States.
     http://www.cses.org/plancom/module3/2005plenary/Jusko2005.pdf

215. Long, Karen J., and W. Phillips Shively. 2005. Applying a Two-Step Strategy to the Analysis of Cross-National Public Opinion Data. Political Analysis 13, no. 4: 327-44.

216. Love, Gregory, and Ryan E. Carin. 2007. What Happens When the Rules Change? Institutional Changes and Voter Turnout. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

217. Lucas, Laura. 2005. The Institutional Determinants of Political Sophistication. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

218. Magalhães, Pedro C. Unpublished. Disaffected Democrats, Negligent Citizens: Political Culture and Political Action in Portugal. Research paperInstituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa.

219. ———. 2005. Disaffected Democrats: Political Attitudes and Political Action in Portugal. West European Politics 28, no. 5: 973-91.

220. ———. Unpublished. Exposure to Polls, Cognitive Mobilization, and Voting Behavior: the 2002 General Elections in Portugal. Research paperInstituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa.
     http://www.ics.ul.pt/corpocientifico/pedromagalhaes/pdf/Exposuretopolls.pdf

221. Mahler, Vincent. 2006. Income Redistribution by the State: A Comparative Analysis of the Developed World. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

222. Maimone, Christina R., and Jeremy C. Pope. 2005. Candidates vs. Parties: How Electoral Systems Shape Voter. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

223. Maimone, Christina Renee. 2007. "Voter decision-making from a comparative perspective." Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.

224. Mainwaring, Scott, and Mariano Torcal. 2005. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory: After the Third Wave of Democratization. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

225. ———. 2005. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. Kellog Institute Working Papers Series WPS#319University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
     http://www.nd.edu/~kellogg/WPS/319.pdf

226. ———. 2005. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization. Working Papers Online Series, Estudio/Working Paper 51/2005Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain: Departamento de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales.

227. ———. 2005. Teoria e institucionalização dos sistemas partidários após a terceira onda de democratização. Opinião Públic 11, no. 2: 249-86.

228. Mainwaring, Scott, and Edurne Zoco. 2007. Political Consequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition. Party Politics 13, no. 2.

229. Markowski, Radoslaw. 2002. Diffuse Political Support in New and Old Democracies. Prepared for the Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems".WZB, Berlin, Germany.

230. ———. 2002. Diffuse Political Support in New and Stable Democracies: Do Institutions Matter? IWM Conferences, Lectures and SeminarsVienna, Austria: Institute for Human Sciences (Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen).

231. ———. 2003. Electoral Accountability in New Democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA, USA.

232. ———. 2003. Incumbents and Opposition: On Two Different Manifestations of Representation and Accountability . Paper presented at the 19th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Durban, South Africa.

233. ———. 2006. Meaningful Choices: Micro Level Logic. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

234. ———. 2007. Representation, Accountability, and ‘Rational Electoral Behavior'. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

235. ———. 2000. Satisfaction with Democracy and Diffuse Political Support. Paper presented at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

236. ———. 2005. Synergy and Trade-offs between Political Representation and Accountability in Stable and New Democracies. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
     http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/87.pdf

237. Marsh, Michael. 2002. Electoral Context. Electoral Studies 21, no. 2: 207-17.

238. ———. Unpublished. An insecure anchor for a floating party system: party identification in Ireland. Manuscript, originally presented at the 2003 ECPR Joint Sessions in EdinburghTrinity College, Dublin.
     http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/Staff/Michael.Marsh/ElectionStudy/partyid.pdf

239. ———. 2003. Party Identification and Party Choice in Ireland. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops (Workshop 26 "Modeling Electoral Choice in Europe in the Twenty-First Century").Edinburgh, Scotland.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ECPR/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/edinburgh/ws26/Marsh.pdf

240. ———. Forthcoming. Party identification in Ireland: An insecure anchor for a floating party system. Electoral Studies (2005).

241. Marsh, Michael, and Cees van der Eijk. 2007. Don’t expect me to vote for you just because I like you, even if you do make me feel warm inside: A comparison of the validity of non-ipsative measures of party support. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

242. McAllister, Ian. 2005. Accountability, Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17, no. 3: 371-79.
     http://polsc.anu.edu.au/staff/mcallister/pubs/Account.pdf

243. ———. 2005. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems: Module 3 and Beyond. 2-3.
     http://acsr.anu.edu.au/newsletters/icore_news_issue12.pdf

244. ———. 2006. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Project: An Overview. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Fukuoka, Japan.

245. ———. 2006. Social Structure and Party Support in the East Asian Democracies. Paper presented at the Conference on Electoral Systems and Electoral Politics.

246. ———. 2007. Social Structure and Party Support in the East Asian Democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies.

247. McAllister, Ian, and Stephen White. 2007. Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Communist Societies. Monitoring Democracy Development and Electoral Behavior in Central and Eastern Europe., .

248. ———. 2006. Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Postcommunist Societies. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Fukuoka, Japan.

249. ———. 2007. Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Postcommunist Societies. Party Politics 13, no. 2: 197-216.
     http://polsc.anu.edu.au/staff/mcallister/pubs/DemConsolid.pdf

250. Meneguello, Rachel. 2007. A democracia brasileira, 21 anos depois. Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Opinión Pública.

251. Milner, Henry. 2002. Civic Drop-outs? What Young Citizens Know and Don’t Know About Politics: Canada in Comparative Perspective. Prepared for presentation at the conference Citizenship on Trial: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Political Socialization of Adolescents.McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
     http://www.youthconference.mcgill.ca/MilnerPaper.doc

252. ———. 2002. Civic Drop-outs? What Young Citizens Know and Don’t Know About Politics: Canada in Comparative Perspective. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Boston, MA.

253. ———. 2001. Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. Presented at the Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Socioeconomics (SASE).Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
     http://www.sase.org/conf2001/papers/milner_henry.pdf

254. ———. 2002. Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. 256UPNE.

255. ———. 2001. Civic Literacy in Comparative Context: Why Canadians Should be Concerned. Policy Matters 2, no. 2: 1-40.
     http://www.irpp.org/pm/archive/pmvol2no2.pdf

256. ———. 2003. Creating an Instrument for Testing Political Knowledge: Theoretical Considerations and Preliminary Findings. Paper presented at the 2nd ECPR General Conference.Marburg, Germany.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ECPR/events/generalconference/marburg/papers/14/2/Milner.pdf

257. ———. 2004. The Phenomenon of Political Dropouts: Age, Abstention and Political Institutions. Paper prepared for presentation at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshop (Workshop 9 "Low Turnout: Does it Matter?").Uppsala, Sweden.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/uppsala/ws9/milner.pdf

258. ———. 2002. Political Participation, and the Political Knowledge of Adults and Adolescents. Paper presented at the at the 30th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops (Workshop 22 "Political Participation and Information").Universita di Torino.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/turin/ws22/milner.pdf

259. ———. 2002. The Voters' Paradox: Bringing back the Knowledge Dimension. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Conference of the Political Studies Association, "Making Politics Count".Aberdeen, Scotland.

260. Milner, Henry, and Kimmo Grönlund. 2004. The Determinants of Political Knowledge in a Comparative Perspective. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

261. Nacif, Benito. 2001. Understanding Party Discipline in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies; the Centralized Party Model. In Legislative Politics in Latin America. Eds. Scott Morgenstern, and Benito Nacif, 254-84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

262. Nalen, James E. 2001. Comparative Elections: Building a Basic Reference Collection. Reference & User Services Quarterly 41, no. 2: 119-26.

263. Neller, Katja, and S. Isabell Thaidigsmann. 2007. Gelungene Identitätserweiterung durch Namensänderung? "Treue " Wähler, Zu- und Abwanderer der Linkspartei bei der Bundestagswahl 2005. In Die Bundestagswahl 2005: Analysen des Wahlkampfes und der Wahlergebnisse. Frank Brettschneider, Oskar Niedermayer, and Bernhard Weßels, 421-56. VS Verlag.

264. Nevitte, Neil, André Blais, Elisabeth Gidengil, and Richard Nadeau. 2000. Socio-Economic Status and Non-Voting: A Comparative Cross-National Analysis. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.
     http://www.ces-eec.umontreal.ca/documents%5CSESNonVoting.pdf

265. Nevitte, Neil, André Blais, Elisabeth Gidengil , and Richard Nadeau. Forthcoming. Socio-economic Status and Non-voting: A Cross-national Comparative Analysis. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

266. Nishizawa, Yoshitaka. 2000. Economic Voting: Do Institutions Affect the Way Voters Evaluate Incumbents? Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.
     http://www1.doshisha.ac.jp/~ynishiza/downloadables/cese0406_economic_voting_by_Nishizawa_final.pdf

267. ———. Forthcoming. Economic Voting: Do Institutions Affect the Way Voters Evaluate Incumbents? In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

268. Norris, Pippa. 2004. "Are Australian MPs in touch with constituents?" Australian Democratic Audit, Democratic Audit of Australia, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, /cses000169.pdf/.
     http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au/papers/200406_norris_mps_constits.pdf

269. ———. 1999. Ballots not Bullets: Testing the Consociational Theories of Ethnic Conflict, Electoral Systems and Democratization. Paper prepared for delivery at the International Conference on Institutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy in the late Twentieth Century.Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
     http://www.nd.edu/~kellogg/pdfs/Norris.pdf

270. ———. 2002. Ballots not Bullets: Testing the Consociational Theories of Ethnic Conflict, Electoral Systems and Democratization. In The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy. Ed. Andrew Reynolds, 206-47. Oxford University Press.

271. ———. 2003. A Comparative Perspective on Political Behaviour and Turnout. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.

272. ———. 2003. Electoral Engineering: Electoral Rules and Voting Choices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.
     http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Acrobat/APSA2003%20Electoral%20Engineering.pdf

273. ———. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

274. ———. 2005. The 'New Cleavage' Thesis and the Social Basis of Radical Right Support. KSG Working Paper No. RWP05-015.

275. ———. 2005. Radical Right: Parties and Voters in the Electoral Marketplace. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionWashington DC, United States.

276. ———. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

277. ———. 2000. The Twilight of Westminster? Electoral Reform and Its Consequences. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington D.C..
     http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.pnorris.shorenstein.ksg/acrobat/apsa2000bpg.pdf

278. ———. 2001. The Twilight of Westminster? Electoral Reform and Its Consequences. Political Studies 49, no. 5: 877-900.
     http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Acrobat/Political%20Studies%20Twilight.pdf

279. ———. 2001. Women's Power at the Ballot Box. In Voter Turnout from 1945 to 2000: A Global Report on Political Participation.Stockholm: International IDEA.

280. ———. 2004. The ‘new cleavage’ thesis and the social basis of radical right support. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
     http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Acrobat/APSA%202004%20Radical%20Right.pdf

281. ———. 2005. The ‘new cleavage’ thesis and the social basis of radical right support. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

282. Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

283. Norris, Pippa, and Pedro Maia Soares. 2005. A tese da "nova clivagem" e a base social do apoio a direita radical. Opinião Pública 11, no. 1: 1-32.

284. Ohr, Dieter, and Henrik Oscarsson. 2003. Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice. Paper presented at the 2nd ECPR General Conference.Marburg, Germany.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ECPR/events/generalconference/marburg/papers/14/7/Ohr.pdf

285. ———. 2004. Leader Traits, Leader Image and Vote Choice. In Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Eds. Kees Aarts, André Blais, and Hermann SchmittOxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press.

286. Orriols, Lluis. 2007. The effect of social spending on vote choice in OECD countries. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

287. Ortega, Carmen. 2000. Incentives to Organise Personal Campaigns in Preferential Voting Systems. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

288. ———. 2006. Preferential Voting Systems and their Impact on the Personalization of Politics. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.
     http://www.cses.org/plancom/2006Seville/Ortega2006.pdf

289. Oscarsson, Henrik. 2003. Ideological Voting Under Different Institutional Contexts. Paper presented at the 2nd ECPR General Conference.Marburg, Germany.

290. Paloheimo, Heikki, Ed. 2005. Vaalit ja demokratia Suomessa. Helsinki: WSOY.

291. Paskeviciute, Aida. 2007. Partisanship and system support in comparative perspective. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

292. Paskeviciute, Aida. 2006. Party Identification and System Legitimacy in Established and New Democracies. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

293. ———. 2006. Party identification and system legitimacy in established and new democracies. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops.Nicosia, Cyprus.
     http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/jointsessions/paperarchive/nicosia/ws22/Paskeviciute.pdf

294. Paskeviciute, Aida, and Christopher J. Anderson. 2004. Political parties, partisanship, and support for the political system in established democracies. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

295. ———. 2003. Political Party Behavior and Political Trust in Contemporary Democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

296. Pattie, Charles J., and Ron J. Johnston. 2004. Party knowledge and candidate knowledge: constituency campaigning and voting and the 1997 British General Election. Electoral Studies 23, no. 4: 795-819.

297. Pickup, Mark. 2007. Sifting through the endogeniety: How to measure the effect of a campaign poll with a poll. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

298. Powell, G. Bingham. 2007. Institutions and Substantive Representation in Developed Democracies: The Impact of Alternative Conceptualizations and Data on the Effects of Election Rules and Party Systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

299. Rai, Sheila. 2000. Political Participation and Voting Behavior: An Analysis of Motivating Factors for Voting in India and Bangladesh. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

300. Rico, Guillem. 2006. Factors of voting personalization in Spanish elections, 1979-2004. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

301. Rosema, Martin, and Catherine De Vries. 2007. The dual nature of EU issue voting: The impact of European integration in national and European parliamentary elections. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

302. Rosenstone, Steven J. 1995. Planning Proceeds on the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.
     http://acsr.anu.edu.au/newsletters/4icore/plan.pdf

303. Ross, Jason. 2007. Individual and Contextual Effects on Political Knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

304. Roßteutscher, Sigrid. 2007. CDU-Wahl 2005: Katholiken, Kirchgänger und eine protestantische Spitzenkandidatin aus dem Osten. In Die Bundestagswahl 2005: Analysen des Wahlkampfes und der Wahlergebnisse. Frank Brettschneider, Oskar Niedermayer, and Bernhard Weßels, 321-48. VS Verlag.

305. Rudi, Tatjana. 2006. What kind of party identification does exist in emerging democracies in Central and Eastern Europe? Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops.Nicosia, Cyprus.

306. Saltman, Richard B., Vaida Bankauskaite, and Karsten Vraengbaeck, Eds. Forthcoming. Decentralization in European health care systems. Berkshire/New York: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.

307. Samuels, David. 2003. Do Differences in Institutional Structure Affect Democratic Accountability? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

308. ———. 2004. The Initial Emergence of Mass Partisanship: Evidence from Brazil. Paper presented at the 4O Encontro Nacional da ABCP - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política.Rio de Janeiro.
     http://www.cienciapolitica.org.br/David_Samuels.pdf

309. ———. 2006. Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 48, no. 2: 1-27.

310. Sapiro, Virginia. 1999. Fifty Years of the National Election Studies: A Case Study in the History of "Big Social Science". Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Atlanta, GA.
     http://www.polisci.wisc.edu/users/sapiro/papers/bignes.pdf

311. Sapiro, Virginia, and Larry M. Bartels. 1998. The American National Election Studies: A Progress Report (in The Profession). 64-68.

312. Scarrow, Hermann. 1999. The Impact of at-Large Elections: Vote Dilution, Choice Dilution and the Voting Rights Act. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

313. Seawright, Jason. 2004. The “Demand Side” of Party System Collapse: Political Preferences and Votes for Insurgent Parties. Paper presented at the Workshop on the analysis of political cleavages and party competition.Duke University, Durham.
     http://www.duke.edu/~skj3/2004PCC/seawright.pdf

314. Sharma, Saroj. 2000. The Impact of Electoral Systems on Parties and Candidates. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

315. Shastri, Sandeep. 2006. Comparing General Election Trends with By Elections: Emerging Patterns in the Indian Electoral Contest and its Implications for Electoral Politics. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

316. Sheng, Emile. 2007. Partisanship in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies.

317. Sheng, Emile C. J. 2005. An Exploratory Comparison of Partisan Strength Across Nations. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
     http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/73.pdf

318. Shinm, Doh Chull, and Byong-Kuen Jhee. 2005. How Does Democratic Regime Change Affect Mass Political Ideology? A Case Study of South Korea in Comparative Perspective. International Political Science Review 26, no. 4: 381-96.

319. Shively, W. Phillips. 2002. The comparative study of electoral systems, after seven years.
     http://acsr.anu.edu.au/newsletters/icore_news_issue9.pdf

320. ———. 2005. Democratic Design: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Project.

321. ———. 1998. News From the CSES Secretariat: CSES Collaborators Meeting Next April.
     http://acsr.anu.edu.au/newsletters/7icore/CSES.pdf

322. Shou, Huisheng. 2007. Gauging Political Support in Transitional Societies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

323. Scheuch, Erwin K. 2003. History and visions in the development of data services for the social sciences. 385-99.

324. Schmitt, Hermann. 1996. Comparative Elections Research: International and European. 1-5.
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/eurodata/newsletter/no4.pdf

325. ———. 12005. Meaningful Choices:Under which conditions do general elections provide a meaningful choice set, and what happens if they don’t?
     cses000425.pdf

326. ———. 2000. Multiple Parteibindungen: Parteibindungen der Schweizerinnen und Schweizer im internationalen Vergleich. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Swiss Political Science Association.Balsthal, Switzerland.
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/manifestos/schmitt/balsthal.pdf

327. ———. 2000. Multiple Party Identifications. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/manifestos/schmitt/berlin.pdf

328. ———. 2002. Multiple Party Identifications. Presented at the Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems".WZB, Berlin, Germany.
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/manifestos/schmitt/berlin.pdf

329. ———. Forthcoming. Multiple Party Identifications. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

330. ———. 2005. Political Parties, Left-Right-Orientations and the Vote in Germany and France. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/manifestos/schmitt/2005%20PartiesIdeologyandtheVote.pdf

331. ———. 2001. Zur vergleichenden Analyse des Einflusses gesellschaftlicher Faktoren auf das Wahlverhalten: Forschungs-fragen, Anlysestrategien und einige Ergebnisse. In Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1998. Eds. Hans-Dieter Klingemann, and Max Kaase, 623-45. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/manifestos/schmitt/akwah00.pdf (conference version)

332. ———. 2000. Zur vergleichenden Analyse des Einflusses gesellschaftlicher Faktoren auf das Wahlverhalten: Forschungs-fragen, Anlysestrategien und einige Ergebnisse. Paper prepared for presentation at the German Political Science Association meeting (Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft).Mannheim, Germany.
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/manifestos/schmitt/akwah00.pdf

333. Schmitt, Hermann, and Dieter Ohr. 2000. Are Party Leaders Becoming More Important in German Elections? Leader Effects on the Vote in Germany, 1961-1998. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington D.C..
     http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/manifestos/schmitt/germanleaders.pdf

334. Schmitt, Hermann, and Bernhard Wessels. 2003. Meaningful Choices: Under which conditions do general elections provide a meaningful choice set, and what happens if they don’t? Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
     ftp://nes.isr.umich.edu/ftp/cses/planningcommittee/module3/CSES_Module3_StimulusPaper_20050812.pdf

335. Scholz, Evi, and Sabine Klein. 2002. Study Monitoring in the ISSP. Presented at the 2002 International Conference on Improving Surveys.University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
     http://www.icis.dk/ICIS_papers/C3_3_4.pdf

336. Scholz, Evi, and Sabine Klein. 2003. Study Monitoring in the ISSP. ZUMA Working Paper No. 52ZUMA, Mannheim, Germany.
     http://www.gesis.org/Publikationen/Zeitschriften/ZUMA_Nachrichten/documents/pdfs/52/zn52_11.pdf

337. Silver, Brian D. 2007. Political Institutions and Support for Democracy by Ethnic and Political Minorities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

338. Simpser, Alberto. 2004. Making Votes Not Count: Strategic Incentives for Electoral Corruption. Working PaperStanford University.
     http://www.stanford.edu/class/polisci353/2004fall/reading/Simpser%20-%20Making%20votes%20not%20count.pdf

339. Sing, Ming. 2004. Origins of Anti-Partyism in Hong Kong. East Asia: An International Quarterly 21, no. 3: 37-57.

340. Singer, Matthew. 2007. Anti-Poverty Welfare Programs and Economic Voting in Mexico. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

341. Singer, Matthew. 2007. "The Electoral Politics of Vulnerability and the Incentives to Cast an Economic Vote." Ph.D., Duke University.

342. Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., and Irina Tomescu-Dubrow. 2006. Representation of Post-Communist European Countries in Cross-National Public Opinion Surveys. Problems of Post-Communism 53, no. 4: 42-52.

343. Solt, Frederick. 2004. Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.
     http://www.unc.edu/~fredsolt/papers/Solt2004MPSA.pdf

344. ———. 2004. Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 385Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University.
     http://www.lisproject.org/publications/liswps/385.pdf

345. Stoker, Laura, and Jake Bowers. 2002. Designing multi-level studies:: sampling voters and electoral contexts. 235-67.

346. Sum, Paul. 2005. Political Participation in Romania: Resources, Attitudes and the Mobilization Capacity of Civil Society. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

347. Štebe, Janez. 2003. Consequences of Voting on Changes in Satisfaction with Democracy in Post-Socialist Countries. Paper presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
     ftp://nes.isr.umich.edu/ftp/cses/meetings/2003Plenary/2003Plenary_panels_Stebe.pdf

348. Thames, Frank C. 2007. Discipline and Party Institutionalization in Post-Soviet Legislatures. Party Politics 13, no. 4: 456-77.

349. Thomassen, Jacques. 2007. Party identification revisited: A comparative study of partisanship and the vote in Europe. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

350. Thomassen, Jacques, and Aarts Kees. 2006. Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Philadelphia, PA.

351. Thomassen, Jacques J. A., and Kees Aarts. 2005. Electoral Institutions and Satisfaction With Democracy. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Washington, DC.

352. ———. 2006. Electoral Institutions and Satisfaction With Democracy. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Fukuoka, Japan.

353. Thomassen, Jacques J. A., and Martin Rosema. 2006. Party identification revisited. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops.Nicosia, Cyprus.

354. Thomassen, Jacques J. A., and Henk van der Kolk. 2000. Economic Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

355. ———. Forthcoming. Satisfaction with Democracy in Old and New Democracies. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

356. Tigno, Jorge, and Linda Luz Guerrero. 2006. Political Capital: The Politics of Leadership Resilience in the Philippines, Thailand, and the United States. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

357. Toka, Gábor. 2007. Policy outcomes, voting, and citizen knowledge. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

358. Tóka, Gábor. 2003. Can Voters Be Equal? A Cross-National Analysis. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
     http://www.personal.ceu.hu/departs/personal/Gabor_Toka/Papers/Can%20Voters%20Be%20Equal.ppt

359. ———. 2003. Can Voters Be Equal? A Cross-national Analysis: Part 1. Review of Sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association 9, no. 2: 51-72.

360. ———. 2004. Can Voters Be Equal? A Cross-national Analysis: Part 2. Review of Sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association 10, no. 1: 47-65.

361. ———. 2006. Citizen Information, Election Outcomes and Good Governance. Paper presented at the conference on Electoral Systems and Electoral Politics.

362. ———. 2007. Citizen Information, Election Outcomes and Good Governance
     . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

363. ———. 2000. Do Some Party Systems Make Equal Votes Unequal? A Comparison of Old and New Democracies. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2000 World Democratization Conference on Re-Thinking Democracy in the New Millennium.University of Houston, Houston, TX.
     http://www.uh.edu/democracy/tokap.pdf

364. ———. 2002. Expressive vs. Instrumental Voting and institutional design. Paper presented at the Conference on the "Comparative Study of Electoral Systems".WZB, Berlin, Germany.

365. ———. Forthcoming. Expressive vs. Instrumental Voting and Institutional Design. In A Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1995-2000. Ed. Hans-Dieter KlingemannOxford: Oxford University Press.

366. ———. 2000. Expressive vs. Instrumental Voting and the Number of Political Parties. Paper prepared for delivery at the XVIIIth World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Québec City, Canada.

367. ———. 2002. Issue Voting and Party Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. In Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West. Studien zur politischen Kultur und zum politischen Prozess - Citizens and Democracy in East and West. Studies in Political Culture and the Political Process. Eds. Dieter Fuchs, Edeltraud Roller, and Bernhard Wessels, 169-85. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

368. ———. 2006. Party Systems and Information Costs. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

369. ———. 2000. Politikai ismeretszint és választói magatartás: Magyarországon nemzetközi összehasonlításban (Political Knowledge and Voting Behaviour: Hungary in Cross-National Comparison). In Társadalmi Riport 2000 (Social Report 2000). Tamás Kolosi, István György Tóth, and György Vukovich, 573-90. Budapest: TÁRKI.

370. ———. 2003. Turnout and Information Effects in Elections. Presented at the CSES Plenary SessionStockholm, Sweden.
     ftp://nes.isr.umich.edu/ftp/cses/meetings/2003Plenary/2003Plenary_panels_Toka.pdf

371. ———. 2000. Turnout and Information Effects on Election Outcomes in a Comparative Perspective. Paper delivered at the conference Political Participation: Building a Research Agenda .Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
     http://www.princeton.edu/~csdp/events/pdfs/Toka.pdf

372. ———. 2002. Voter Inequality, Turnout and Information Effects in a Cross-National Perspective. Helen Kellogg Institute Working Paper Series No. 297Notre Dame, IN: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame.
     http://www.nd.edu/~kellogg/WPS/297.pdf

373. Torcal, Mariano. 2003. Political Disaffection and Democratization History in New Democracies. Working Paper #308Notre Dame, Ind.: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
     http://kellogg.nd.edu/WPS/308.pdf

374. Torcal, Mariano, and Scott Mainwaring. 2006. Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

375. Tumanov, Sergei, Alexander Gasparishvili, and David Rotman. 2006. Political Parties and Electoral Preferences in Russia, Byelorussia and Ukraine at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Presented at the CSES Conference and Planning Commmittee MeetingSeville, Spain.

376. Tverdova, Yuliya. 2007. How Widespread is Corruption? A Cross-National Study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American National Election Studies.

377. Ullrich, Heidi. 2004. The Impact of Policy Networks in Agricultural Trade Liberalization During the Uruguay and Doha Rounds: The Role of Ideas, Interests and Institutions. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Chicago, IL.

378. Van der Meer, Tom, and Peer Scheepers. 2007. The politicised participant? Explaining the impact of left-right position on political participation . Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

379. Vowles, Jack. Civic Engagement in New Zealand: Decline or Demise. Inaugural professorial address delivered at the Conference Centre, University of Auckland.

380. ———. 2007. Does globalisation affect public perceptions of ‘who in power can make a difference’? Evidence from 37 countries, 1996-2005. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

381. ———. 2007. Does Globalization Affect Public Perceptions of "Who is in Power Can Make a Difference"? Evidence from 37 Countries, 1996-2005. Monitoring Democracy Development and Electoral Behavior in Central and Eastern Europe.

382. ———. 2002. Is Responsible Party Government Dead? Government Strength or Weakness, Globalisation, and Public Perceptions in 27 Countries, 1996-2001. Paper prepared for delivery at the 50th conference of the Australasian Political Studies Association.Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

383. ———. 2002. Is Responsible Party Government Dead? Government Strength or Weakness, Globalisation, and Public Perceptions in 27 Countries, 1996-2001. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Boston, MA.

384. Warwick, Paul V. 2007. Relative Extremism and Relative Moderation: Strategic Party Positioning in Democratic Systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

385. Wattenberg, Martin P. 2003. Elections: Was the 2000 Presidential Election Fair? An Analysis of Comparative and Retrospective Survey Data. Presidential Studies Quarterly 33, no. 4: 889-97.

386. ———. 2003. Electoral Turnout: The New Generation Gap. British Elections & Parties Review. Eds. Colin Rallings, Roger Scully, Jonathan Tonge, and Paul Webb, 159-73Routledge.

387. ———. 2002. The New Generation Gap. Presented at the EPOP Annual Conference (Elections, Public Opinion and Parties).University of Salford, UK.

388. ———. 2002. Where Have All the Voters Gone? 224 pp.Harvard University Press.

389. Wessels, Bernhard. 2001. Aufrichtiges Wahlverhalten: Parteiorientierungen, Kandidatenbeurteilungen und generalisierte Politikdistanzen. In Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen zur Bundestagswahl 1998. Eds. Hans-Dieter Klingemann, and Max KaaseOpladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

390. ———. 2005. Discount by Account? Striking a Balance for Vote Choice. Paper presented at the international conference on Elections and Democratic Governance, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS).Taipei, Taiwan.
     http://www.ipsas.sinica.edu.tw/image/ipsas/1/80.pdf

391. ———. 2000. Gruppenbindung und Wahlverhalten: 50 Jahre Wahlen in der Bundesrepublik. In 50 Jahre Empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland. Eds. Markus Klein, Wolfgang Jagodzinski, Ekkehard Mochmann, and Dieter Ohr, 129-55. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

392. ———. 2001. Ideologische Atomisierung oder Wahlerwandel? Wahlverhalten in Deutschland 1976-1998. In Politik heute: Das Ende der politisierten Sozialstrukter? Eds. Frank Brettschneider, Jan van Deth, and Edeltraud RollerOpladen: Leske and Budrich.

393. ———. 2000. Kanzler- oder Politikwechsel? Bestimmungsgründe des Wahlerfolgs der SPD bei der Bundestagswahl 1998. Die Republik auf dem Weg zur Normalität? Eds. Jan van Deth, Hans Rattinger, and Edeltraud Roller, 35-66. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.

394. Wessels, Bernhard. 2004. Sagfragen, generalisierte politische Positionen und Leistungsbewertungen: Zur Konditionierung praferenzorientierten Wahlens. Die Bundestagswahl 2002: Analysen der Wahlergebnisse und des Wahlkampfes. Ed. Jan W. van Deth, Frank Brettschneider, Roller, and Edeltraud, 143. VS Verlag.

395. Wessels, Bernhard. 2003. Voting against Preferences? Accountability as a Determinant of Vote Choice. Paper presented at the 19th World Congress of the International Political Science Association.Durban, South Africa.

396. Wessels, Bernhard, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 2001. Group Conflict, Voting, and Legitimacy: A Cross-National Perspective on Political Integration. Paper prepared for the ECPR First General Conference 2001.Canterbury, UK.
     http://www.wz-berlin.de/~wessels/Downloads/canterbury3a.pdf

397. Wessels, Bernhard, and Hermann Schmitt. 2007. Meaningful Choices, Political Supply, and Institutional Effectiveness. Monitoring Democracy Development and Electoral Behavior in Central and Eastern Europe.

398. ———. 2007. Meaningful Choices, Political Supply, and Institutional Effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

399. ———. 2006. What Shapes Electoral Choice Options? Institutional Determinants of the Distinctiveness of Choice Options. Paper presented at the conference on Electoral Systems and Electoral Politics.

400. Wlezien, Christopher, and Mark N. Franklin. 2002. The future of election studies: Introduction. 157-60.

401. Wong, Yiu-chung. 2004. One Country, Two Systems in Crisis: Hong Kong's Transformation Since the Handover. p. 53Lexington Books.

402. Xezonakis, Georgios. 2007. The conditional effect of political leadership on party support. Ideological positioning and institutional context. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research.

403. Xezonakis, Georgios. 2007. The Impact of Leaders on Party Support: The Importance of Contextual Effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

404. Yamada, Masahiro. 2006. Were the Low Information Voters Mobilized by Koizumi’s Populist Strategy in the 2005 Lower House Election in Japan? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

405. Zielinsk, Jakub, Kazimierz M. Slomczynski, and Goldie Shabad. 2005. Electoral Control In New Democracies: The Perverse Incentives of Fluid Party Systems . World Politics 57, no. 3: 365-95.